High Court has declined to provide immediate relief to a man who petitioned that his wife be stopped from terminating her pregnancy, but sent notices to the woman and the central government.
Rajeev Nandi sought the court's intervention saying it was against the law of natural equity to deny any right to the husband from preventing a wife from aborting his child.
"It is quite ridiculous that such a law was passed in the country, without paying the least thought to the sentiments of a father," Nandi told IANS referring to provisions of the Medical Termination of Pregnancy (MTP) Act.
The Lucknow bench of the court, comprising Justice Jagdish Bhalla and Justice M.A. Khan, Friday declined to provide immediate relief to the petitioner but issued notices to the wife Rakhi as well as the union government since the petitioner has challenged MTP Act.
"I have challenged the provisions of Section 3 (4)(b) of the Act which appear arbitrary," said C.B. Pandey, Nandi's counsel.
Rakhi, who is two months pregnant, has been insisting on going for an abortion - against Nandi's wishes.
According to Nandi, "I had an arranged marriage and have had no dispute with my wife, who suddenly changed her mind after she visited her parents in West Bengal recently.
"After failing to persuade her to get over the idea, I had no choice but to move the court. Now let us see what happens," Nandi told IANS.
Source
Rajeev Nandi sought the court's intervention saying it was against the law of natural equity to deny any right to the husband from preventing a wife from aborting his child.
"It is quite ridiculous that such a law was passed in the country, without paying the least thought to the sentiments of a father," Nandi told IANS referring to provisions of the Medical Termination of Pregnancy (MTP) Act.
The Lucknow bench of the court, comprising Justice Jagdish Bhalla and Justice M.A. Khan, Friday declined to provide immediate relief to the petitioner but issued notices to the wife Rakhi as well as the union government since the petitioner has challenged MTP Act.
"I have challenged the provisions of Section 3 (4)(b) of the Act which appear arbitrary," said C.B. Pandey, Nandi's counsel.
Rakhi, who is two months pregnant, has been insisting on going for an abortion - against Nandi's wishes.
According to Nandi, "I had an arranged marriage and have had no dispute with my wife, who suddenly changed her mind after she visited her parents in West Bengal recently.
"After failing to persuade her to get over the idea, I had no choice but to move the court. Now let us see what happens," Nandi told IANS.
Source